Hot Topics
September 2, 2009
The New York Times has been sparking great discussion in the past week with it’s article about The Future of Reading. Stanley Fish has caused similar debate with his articles What Should Colleges Teach and What Should Colleges Teach Part 2.
In his first article, Fish laments that colleges are no longer teaching composition courses that focus strictly on the craft of writing. He wishes to see more focus on crafting an argument and understanding grammar and syntax, rather than content-based writing courses that use interesting topics to get students to want to write. In his second article, he responds to the flurry of complaints he received in the first article’s comments.
The argument highlights the balancing act we face between getting students to be engaged with their writing and teaching them to be competent crafters of the English language. I understand the motivations of “writing courses” focused on controversial issues that will inspire and engage students to want to write. However, I also feel we are not doing enough to teach our students how to write effectively.
In many ways, isn’t this the same argument we have in every issue in education? Love of writing vs. mechanics? A love of literature vs. phonics? Concepts vs. math facts? And haven’t we learned yet that the most effective answer is “yes and yes” – you need to teach both?
It seems to me, a course that uses articles and essays written on interesting, engaging topics could also teach grammar and mechanics by using those essays as mentor texts. I believe this is what we try to do when we use mentor texts at the elementary level to teach sentence structure and style.
However I do feel that we as teachers need to be sure we are capable of teaching grammar and mechanics well. Much as I felt I learned how to multiply and divide all over again when I first began learning how to teach those concepts, when I look at why I change verb tense or use a comma, I find I don’t have a very strong grasp of the subject at all. Things just “look right” or “sound right”. Obviously, not good enough.
I think this article piqued my interest for two reasons. First – and here’s where I get to put on my snobby teacher hat -I am appalled at the poor spelling and grammar people use on Facebook! It’s unfathomable to me that one would not reread his or her comment and fix the wrong homophone or mispelled word! [pause while I scan upwards to make sure I haven't made an such aggregious errors in this post...] Secondly, since I’m not taking classes this semester, I’ve been hoping to tackle the pile of “teacher books” I have waiting for me on my desk. I think this solved the question of which book I should read first: Mechanically Inclined: Building Grammar, Usage, and Style into Writer’s Workshop
